At CES, I discovered an AI tool from Qlay that detects when people use AI to cheat during remote interviews. The creator estimates 40% of candidates are doing this. If that’s even half true, what does it mean for remote depositions? 

Has some sort of AI proctoring become necessary for remote depositions and testimony or

How can the appropriate use of AI in courts and transparency? UNESCO‘s new guidelines for AI in courts highlight three critical risks : 1) Private companies controlling judicial tools focus on profit, not fairness, 2) There are subtle manipulation opportunities through biased AI outputs and 3) There may be public and legislative pressure on

Off to Las Vegas for my 7th year covering CES, where the AI hype machine often runs at full throttle. I’m going to try to separate substance from noise and get an idea of trends and issues that may impact legal.

I’ll be especially interested in the gaps between vendor promises and implementation reality. Will

Here’s a scenario could become routine: You’re in trial, opposing counsel shows a video that’s damaging to your client, but your gut says something’s not quite right. What do you do? How should the Court approach it?

There’s a good new University of Colorado study on deepfakes and video evidence. Even though we talk about

Imagine this: You’re on deadline, procrastinated on research (don’t judge), and ChatGPT that you counted on to help suddenly dies. That was my Nov 18. Turns out the Cloudflare outage revealed some uncomfortable truths about tech dependency and cybersecurity gaps. Maybe lawyers  and legal professionals need to pump the brakes on wholesale AI adoption. And

Traditional law firms vs. tech-affiliated AI-first firms: The future may not be what we think it is. Blackstone recently invested  in the legal tech complinace vendor Norm AI, which then immediately launched its own law firm offering “AI-native legal services.” We’re starting to see tech companies create captive law firms to deliver legal services at